Template talk:sic

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 69.120.66.131 in topic Using within external links
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This used to be a language code for Malinguat until SIL retired it, splitting it into Keak [keh] and Sos Kundi [sdk]. Now it's redirect for {{SIC}}. — This unsigned comment was added by Bequw (talkcontribs) at 02:48, 10 February 2009‎.

Renaming "SIC" as "sic"

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from the page Wiktionary:Grease pit/2016/August.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The template {{sic}} was originally renamed {{SIC}} as sic was an ISO 639-3 code. However, it has since ceased to be one, at least from February 2009 when it was turned into a redirect to {{SIC}}. Does anyone object to making the primary template {{sic}} again, and turning {{SIC}} into a redirect? — SMUconlaw (talk) 20:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm fine with it. —CodeCat 20:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
A usabiity improvement. DCDuring TALK 21:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
I suppose so; though isn't it a bit unwise to use any three-letter lower-case code, if future ISO changes are liable to break it? Equinox 21:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
I don't think we need to care about that any more. DTLHS (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Correct, because we no longer have the language codes as templates. (Compare how see is still a valid language code, but we have {{see}}. Indeed, we already have {{sic}}, this is just a proposal to make it the main template and make {{SIC}} a redirect, reversing the current arrangement.) - -sche (discuss) 22:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
OK, this seems uncontentious and there were no objections so I went ahead and made the move. Thanks. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


[edit]

Is there a way to make this template usable within external links? Currently it's impossible, and replacing it with [''sic''] is hardly better.
For example, see how the following render:

The only workaround I know of is to manually write out [''sic''] but with some kind of code escape for the right square bracket: either [''sic''] or [''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki>. Compare the following:

  • [https://www.example.com/ Exmple [''sic''<nowiki>]</nowiki>]
    Exmple [sic]
  • {{R:gem:HGE|head=*barizīnaz [''sic''&rsqb;}}
    Orel, Vladimir (2003) “*barizīnaz [sic]”, in A Handbook of Germanic Etymology[3], Leiden: Brill, →ISBN

(A comment in the code, i.e. <!--[sic]-->, can also be used of course, but this is pointless as it is invisible except to editors.)

It goes without saying that this is a clunky, far-from-ideal solution. Most users upon noticing the problem would probably avoid messing with [sic] at all in links, even though it is sometimes needed. I'm not really concerned with keeping the glossary link working; it would just be useful to extend the capacity of this template to handling the situation I've described. — 69.120.66.131 01:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I added a nolink=1 parameter to fix this:
70.175.192.217 02:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ah, thanks! Somehow I didn't realize it was that simple. 😅 — 69.120.66.131 02:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply