不可思議

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search
See also 不思議

Contents

Translingual[edit]

simpl. 不可思议
trad. 不可

Number[edit]

不可思議

  1. 1064

See also[edit]


Japanese[edit]

Kanji in this term

Adjectival noun[edit]

不可思議 (な-na inflection, hiragana ふかしぎ, romaji fukashigi)

  1. mysterious, inscrutable

Inflection[edit]

Noun[edit]

不可思議 (hiragana ふかしぎ, romaji fukashigi)

  1. In the traditional Japanese number system, 1064 or ten vigintillion of the American system.
  2. mysteriousness

References[edit]

  • Seiko Genius Japanese-English Electronic Dictionary (ジーニアス和英辞典)

Mandarin[edit]

simpl. 不可思议
trad. 不可

Pronunciation[edit]

  • IPA: [ pu˥˩kʰə˨˩sɨ˥˥i˥˩ ]

Etymology[edit]

Literally: cannot ponder the significance of

Idiom[edit]

不可思議 (traditional, Pinyin bùkěsīyì, simplified 不可思议)

  1. mysterious; unimaginable; incomprehensible
    簡直不可思議
    From the sound of it, this is something that is simply incomprehensible.

Noun[edit]

不可思議 (traditional, Pinyin bùkěsīyì, simplified 不可思议)

  1. The number 1064

References[edit]

  • Wikipedia-logo.png 十進位 on the Mandarin Wikipedia.zh.Wikipedia:十進位
  • "不可思議" (in Mandarin), Guoyu Cidian On-line Mandarin Dictionary (國語辭典). URL accessed on 2009-05-17.
  • 1997, Jerome P. Keuper, Chinese 1000: Idiomatic and Colloquial Expressions (中国话:习惯用法和口语的表达法) (in English/Mandarin), Florida: Krieger Publishing Company, ISBN 1-57524-006-8:

Min Nan[edit]

simpl. 不可思议
trad. 不可

Pronunciation[edit]

  • IPA: [ put˥˥kʰo˥˥su˧˧ɡi˧˧ ]

Etymology[edit]

Literally: cannot ponder the significance of

Idiom[edit]

不可思議 (traditional, POJ put-khó-su-gī, simplified 不可思议)

  1. mysterious; unimaginable; incomprehensible
    • 2005: anon., M̄-nā 無路用, 更加是阻礙!! (blog rant about poor news coverage: Not only is it not useful, it is a hinderance!)
      無仝 ê 新聞台, 竟然 lóng 報導差不多仝款 ê 新聞內容, che 有影不可思議 ê 現象
      bô-kâng ê sin-bûn-tâi, kéng-jiân lóng pò-tō chha-put-to kâng-khóan ê sin-bûn lāi-iông, che ū-iáⁿ sī put-khó-su-gī ê hiān-siōng
      Even for different newstations, they still all report almost the same news content. This is really an incomprehensible phenomenon