Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-06/Tohru for deadmin

Tohru for deadmin

• Voting on: Removing Tohru as an admin. No edits since 2012.

• Vote starts: 00:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
• Vote ends: 23:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

• Vote created: Turnedlessef (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
• Discussion:

  Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2016-06/Tohru for deadmin

Support

1. Support Special:Log/Tohru suggests Tohru does not need the tools. The next-to-last logged action is from 26 October 2010, which is about 5.5 years ago. The single last logged action is from 2012.
   Furthermore, the magic keyword {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} gives 100 admins, and therefore, there is no risk that removing admin rights creates unhealthy concentration of power. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
2. Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 08:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
3. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
4. Support --Vahag (talk) 08:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
5. Support without prejudice to re-establishing the user as an admin if he/she becomes active again. Equinox ◑ 08:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
6. Support without prejudice per Equinox. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

1. Abstain I have no opinion, but I just wanted to point out that I read deadmin as dead-min rather than as de-admin. I found it pretty funny. --WikiTiki89 18:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

   This also works well with co- + in-: coin here, coin-mate, coin tense, etc. Equinox ◑ 08:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

   Q: What do they call it when the reindeer cavalry arrives to save the day? A: reinforcements! --Tropylium (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

   I reread the title of this vote just now and had the same reäction as Wyang. I was curious whether someone had already commented on the matter, and y'all did not disappoint. —JohnC5 15:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Decision

6-0-1 (100%-0%) Passes. @Stephen G. Brown, SemperBlotto, Chuck Entz --Daniel Carrero (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)