- We don't use "#redirect []" for spelling variations though. A short entry referencing bollocks from ballocks seems appropriate to me. --Connel MacKenzie T C 22:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- At the moment there are duplicate articles,though no doubt with differrences. Which is what I'd prefer to see us avoid. I was not suggesting a simple #redirect, but a brief entry saying something like "Spelling variant (archaic) of bollocks"
"I'm a ballocks"
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- If the Joyce usage is the one on the Citations page, then it just seems like it is a slightly more figurative usage of definition 3 at bollocks (I really think bollocks and ballocks should be merged). --WikiTiki89 09:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)