Talk:stunt cock

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

stunt cock

Hekaheka (talk • contribs) thinks this is SOP, I don't. Discuss. — [Ric Laurent] — 23:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Not SoP to me, because the penis isn't performing stunts. Equinox ◑ 23:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Some snippets from Google Books:

• It is her hands we are watching as the pizza comes out of the microwave — the other hands are all stunt hands
• "I bet there was a stunt ass standing by in case I chickened out and lost it."
• "stunt pussy noun a female pornography performer who fills in for another performerfor the purposes of genital filming" (no uses on Google Books, just mentions it seems. Also none for "stunt cunt" even though it rhymes)

Fugyoo

Stunt cunt. Fucking lawlz <3 — [Ric Laurent] — 01:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Even stuntman would not be inclusion-worthy were it not for the application of WT:COALMINE. So all we need are three cites of stuntcock to pass this RfD. DCDuring TALK 02:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Or a sense at stunt meaning "stand-in, substitute". The cock, hands, ass, etc. above are not performing stunts. Stunt man could be sum of parts (if two words) but that's because he performs stunts, not because he is a substitute or stand-in. Equinox ◑ 13:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Keep. There are multiple possible meanings of "stunt" and "cock" which objectively make sense, but would be incorrect. One might call a rubber chicken used in a practical joke a "stunt cock", but this would be wrong, idiomatically. bd2412 T 17:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

If there are are multiple possible meanings, why pick just one? If I make a movie of the adventures of a rooster, I might want to use a stunt cock in a cock-fighting scene. There are situations in which the reader must figure out themself, which of the possible combinations best fits the context. I'd still delete. --Hekaheka 05:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

I think we are missing a sense of "stunt". It seems that the word has acquired by extension a sense that is close to "substitute". No dangerous performances in these examples picked from the internet:

That's the movie where Kirk refused to kiss the actress playing his wife so they had to get Kirk's real wife to be stunt lips.

I asked my husband if he could just hire a stunt wife for this. ("this" = a social occasion in which the real wife did not really like to participate)

You ever look at a picture of yourself and think, “Do I really look like that?” Sean was taking happy, rumpled Easter morning pics and as I scanned them I thought, “Damn, that looks like a stunt belly.”

--Hekaheka 18:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Hekaheka that we're missing a sense of "stunt". - -sche (discuss) 19:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, add the sense to 'stunt' unless of course it's not attestable. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Didn't have a clue what it meant before looking at the page. Keep entry and revert my innocence if possible. DAVilla 04:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I bet there are a lot of two-word combinations that any of us does not have a clue of, but that isn't necessarily a justification for inclusion. This is not a set term either, as one could as well use stunt dick, stunt penis or even stunt organ. Penis is not the only organ that may be replaced by a stunt in a movie: stunt hand, stunt finger.... And, with the added sense for "stunt", it is (or will be, I did not check) a sum of parts. --Hekaheka 05:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Hand, finger, penis etc. I would have figured out. My first guess for stunt cock was a trained rooster. DAVilla 20:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Keep pretty oddLucifer 02:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Since when has oddnessbecome an inclusion criteria? --Hekaheka 05:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

kept no consensus -- Liliana • 04:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)