User talk:Tetromino

I don't know how nobody has thought to welcome you yet, so here it is:

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! --Barytonesis (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tetromino,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wiktionary and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 14:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tetromino,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tetromino,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

месяц

Привет,

Значение "ущербная, неполная луна" довольно новое. Даже в 19-ом веке "месяц" был просто синонимом луны, как и в соседних славянских языках или старославянском. Так например, это значение было включено в "Полный французско-россійскій словарь" 1828 года в наглядном примере "pleine lune" = "полный мѣсяцъ". --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Спасибо, не знал! Tetromino (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

фандрайзинг

Hello,

Is the English loanword фандрайзинг (fandrajzing) really syllabified as [fɐnˈdrajzʲɪnk] rather than [fɐndˈrajzʲɪnk], even though there is a morphemic break between the /d/ and the /r/ since the word is composed of "fund" and "raising"? The relationship between morphemic and syllabic structure in Macedonian is something I've been looking at in detail for the Macedonian transcription module so I've been looking at older modules for inspiration and this word caught my eye. Best wishes. Martin123xyz (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I assume that educated bilingual people or emigrants living in the West might sillabify it as фанд-рай-зинг, but ordinary Russian speakers in Russia do sillabify it as фан-драй-зинг. Note that -фанд- is not perceived as a stem in Russian (фанд is not a Russian word; the Russian term for fund is фонд). Instead the whole of -фандрайз- is seen as a two-syllable foreign-origin stem, and the syllable break in that stem falls where it's natural for the Russian language. Tetromino (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. It is much appreciated. Martin123xyz (talk) 06:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

List with words from Moscow or Saint Petersburg

Hey, I happened to come across this old blogpost with words associated with Moscow or Saint Petersburg. Some of the words are not on en.wikt. Maybe it is of some use. I cannot vouch for the quality of the pairings or definitions. ←₰-→ Lingo ^Bingo _Dingo (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

пасибо

Привет,

Можешь, пожалуйста, проверить, не напутал ли я чего-нибудь в описании и лейблах? Спасибо огромное! Thadh (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@Thadh Немного поправил. Тут скорее не eye dialect, а pronunciation spelling (eye dialect по форме ближе языку падонкаф, то есть обычное произношение слова, выраженное необычной орфографией). Есть вопрос по цитате из Лебедева: «моя посол» — это разве не «моя пошёл»? Tetromino (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

А-а, слушай, ты наверное прав! Я-то толко в Google Books текст видел, сам не понимал, что за текст такой странный... Спасибо за поправки! Thadh (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

за vs в течение

@Tetromino @Atitarev. I ran into a bit of an issue trying to clarify the first temporal sense of за, which is glossed as "similar to в течение". It makes sense to define the first as "during, within, inside (of)" when dealing with time, and the same for the second; but there seems to be an opposition between them that @Thadh mentioned to me, which is that you can use "в течение" with an imperfective, but the usage of "за" or "в течение" in the perfective seems to be distinguished by some Aktionsart, which I don't know a lot about in this context.

Verbs which are gradual or involve a process of creation prefer "за" (сделать, создать, прочесть/прочитать, написать (perfect only)), whereas those you might call semelfactive take "в течение" (вернуть, написать (non-perfect only)).

I think it might be best to point to a new usage note on each page which clarifies these usages. If you guys have some input on this I'd really appreciate it! Anarhistička Maca (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Anarhistička Maca: Hi, could you point to the specific edit @Thadh mentioned you?

The usage note may not be easy to write, as the usage difference is not so straightforward at all and it can't be perfect at all. you may want to Google yourself. Some attempts to explain is here "https://hinative.com/questions/18291460" but I can see flaws in the explanations even by native speakers.

I may try later in a few days (if nobody does earlier). Right now I don't what to write ATM. Perhaps usage examples would be best, rather than explaining? Not sure even these prepositions need to be contrasted but I'll see what I can do. Sometimes, just need a Sprachgefühl on what feels right and wrong, unfortunately but you can always ask native speakers if a specific usage seems right or not. Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 23:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Atitarev: This was done in a private message off-wiki; I was just thinking out loud. Thadh (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Thadh: Thanks. Are you able to think of helpful usage notes or examples per request? Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 23:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)