桂: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

External tools: Page statistics • Find when text was added/removed


Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 March 2024

26 March 2024

10 March 2024

9 March 2024

13 January 2024

23 June 2023

17 March 2023

16 January 2023

5 November 2022

2 October 2022

26 August 2022

1 August 2022

9 July 2022

22 September 2021

5 February 2021

27 December 2020

30 June 2020

5 May 2020

30 March 2020

23 March 2020

22 February 2020

20 February 2020

4 January 2020

2 October 2019

30 July 2019

18 March 2019

5 November 2018

5 May 2018

18 March 2018

  • curprev 02:2902:29, 18 March 2018Geographyinitiative talk contribs 10,856 bytes +14 Undo revision 49172817 by Dokurrat (talk) I personally think that the glyph origin for 桂 doesn't change between the two etymologies. In my view, they didn't reinvent the character 桂 when they announced that it would serve as the simplified form of 鱖. Maybe in etymology 2 the function of 木 as a semantic component as been reduced to meaninglessness, but 圭 is still functional as a phonetic component. That's just my opinion. undo Tag: Undo

17 March 2018

23 January 2018

26 December 2017

18 October 2017

19 August 2017

22 July 2017

22 June 2017

24 May 2017

17 November 2016

28 September 2016

27 September 2016

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)