Talk:electronic toll collection
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412 in topic electronic toll collection
Deletion discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
ummm Equinox ◑ 01:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's happening in a number of countries with toll roads, like Norway. Toll booths may become a thing of the past. Donnanz (talk) 08:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- That may well be, probably is, but it's still just electronic + toll + collection. Delete. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- "System to eliminate delays on toll roads" isn't really part of the definition and should go. Not even true, you can never hope to eliminate delays all together. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should read "delays at toll booths", I think. Donnanz (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless. The reason something was created is not part of the definition. It would be like defining Coca-Cola as "drink to help quit morphine". --WikiTiki89 19:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just think of the benefits of a cashless society. No more digging in your pockets for crumpled-up fivers. There's a Wikipedia article, but no doubt you'll disregard that [1]. Donnanz (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- a robot that can read your emotions would also be useful, but that doesn't make it a dictionary term. Equinox ◑ 01:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless of what benefits something may have, they are not part of the definition. --WikiTiki89 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- a robot that can read your emotions would also be useful, but that doesn't make it a dictionary term. Equinox ◑ 01:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just think of the benefits of a cashless society. No more digging in your pockets for crumpled-up fivers. There's a Wikipedia article, but no doubt you'll disregard that [1]. Donnanz (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless. The reason something was created is not part of the definition. It would be like defining Coca-Cola as "drink to help quit morphine". --WikiTiki89 19:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should read "delays at toll booths", I think. Donnanz (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- "System to eliminate delays on toll roads" isn't really part of the definition and should go. Not even true, you can never hope to eliminate delays all together. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- That may well be, probably is, but it's still just electronic + toll + collection. Delete. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unambiguous sum-of-parts.--Dmol (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. If you know what each of these 3 words means, you know all one needs to know to understand this term. That's SoP. -- · (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Simple SOP. - -sche (discuss) 06:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: This is sum of parts (SOP) term, and I see no redeeming qualities to grant it a keeping excetion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --WikiTiki89 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. bd2412 T 14:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)