Talk:-geddon

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: June–October 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: June–October 2020[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


-geddon#english seems like it is just a common portmaneuau component, rather than bona fide noun forming suffix. All listed attestations are poorly/sparsely used, which definitely suggests this term is more of an ad-hoc conversational utility than an independent linguistic lemma. Achierius (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delete. All words using it are portmanteaus of Armageddon, and can be listed as derived terms there. This ain't a suffix. DonnanZ (talk) 08:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
How does it differ from -gate? Is that a suffix? Or are all words using it portmanteaus of Watergate? —Mahāgaja · talk 10:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The difference with -gate is dictionary recognition, perhaps because it is better known than -geddon, which I can't find in Oxford. If it can be found in other reputable dictionaries, keeping it can be considered. DonnanZ (talk) 11:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I do query Etymology 2 of -gate though (in place names), which probably come straight from gate. A tollgate or gate in a town wall are sources I have come across. DonnanZ (talk) 11:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Probably in some placenames in Scotland and Northern England it's from gate² street, lane. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
That certainly applies to some streets up north, but there can also be terrible corruptions - Bathgate, according to a book I have, comes from Cumbric badd + ceto- ("boat wood"), recorded as Batket c1160, definitely not from bath + gate! DonnanZ (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
"boar wood" actually, I misread it. DonnanZ (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
The main difference is that -gate is used by people who don't seem to be referring to Watergate. You still have combinations like "carmageddon" that show awareness of the word "Armageddon". Chuck Entz (talk) 03:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Abstain Delete. Words built on this should be indicated as {{blend|en|XYZ|Armageddon}}.SGconlaw (talk) 11:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Abstain Delete. It's not productive enough to be considered a suffix like -gate. There is also carmageddon used to refer to the consequences of closing a major highway, possibly limited to Southern California. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Keep. There's a point at which a word is used enough to construct portmanteaus that it creates a productive suffix. This is not as popular as -gate, but it's crossed that threshold. Coronageddon appears robustly attestable. Then there's a thousand nonce words like potatogeddon, which while not independently attestable by our standards, still exist. Not every iteration of -ception is independently attestable, but the fact it exists as a productive suffix is. WordyAndNerdy (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Keep per WaN. @Sgconlaw, Vox Sciurorum, I encourage you to look at the evidence of productivity of this suffix. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge: Struck through delete to abstain instead. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge: I also think I don't know enough on the subject. Abstaining. — SGconlaw (talk) 12:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply