Template talk:zh-historical-dict
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Untitled section[edit]
See Talk:㫃 for related discussion. Dokurrat (talk) 10:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Categorization[edit]
@KevinUp Hi, now this template on entry 屙 is broken. Any idea how to fix? Dokurrat (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Dokurrat: Oops, I forget that you've been using this for
{{zh-forms}}
as well. The issue here is that it conflicts with Module:zh-forms. There are two solutions I can think of: (1) Remove the categorization (but that means the entry itself does not enter Category:Chinese terms with obsolete senses) (2) Create a separate template for the purpose of having the tooltip sign. I can then search through entries where the template is used for this purpose and list it out for you. - Fixing Module:zh-forms will categorize any entry using this template. Or would you prefer to just use
{{zh-forms|alt=𡱻-historical variant}}
instead? KevinUp (talk) 08:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)- @KevinUp: I don't mind creating a separate template for usages in
{{zh-forms}}
. Dokurrat (talk) 08:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @KevinUp: I don't mind creating a separate template for usages in
polysyllabic words[edit]
Can this template be used for polysyllabic words? If not, should I use {{lb|zh|obsolete|rare}}
instead? (I like the OED label "rare-0" for terms with no citations.) --Dine2016 (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)