The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Keep. A Merriam-Webster term, also defined in other popular mono- and bilngual dictionaries. Even though it seems unfair to other races or ethnicities, whites are at the top of the food chain, that's why the term exists and is common. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The fact of this being an ideology is what makes it non-idiomatic. Going just by the literal meanings, one could say that there is "white supremacy" in ice hockey and "black supremacy" in basketball, but if you actually said that, you'd get some funny looks because the phrases carry ideological connotations. bd2412 T 02:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- That distinction should be covered by a proper definition of supremacy. Delete all. --WikiTiki89 03:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Seems obvious SoP as no other way to interpret this than as supremacy of the white (black or Arabs). Note supremacy has a dedicated sense, thought it probably shouldn't. And if it should, it needs to be worded so it's correct. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, but I think the dedicated sense at supremacy is necessary. — Ungoliant (Falai) 18:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Abstain on "black supremacy" and "Arab supremacy". --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree with the outcome of white supremacy but if we're going for consistency and appealing to an 'ideological' sense of the word, then we should keep black supremacy and Arab supremacy (or sense of racial supremacy or national supremacy). So yes, I think a no-consensus close should be appropriate. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 04:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)