-ㅅ-

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
See also: and -ㅅ

Jeju[edit]

Etymology[edit]

Cognate with Middle Korean (Yale: -s).

Interfix[edit]

(-s-)

  1. genitive marker sometimes placed between a vowel-final syllable of the first constituent and a syllable of the second constituent when forming compounds, and also after a locative marker when attributing a noun.

Korean[edit]

Etymology[edit]

From Middle Korean (Yale: -s, inanimate or honorific genitive particle), from Old Korean (-s, inanimate genitive particle). Possibly cognate with the rare and ancient -s- genitive interfix in Japanese, as in 春雨 (harusame).

Pronunciation[edit]

The actual underlying phoneme in Contemporary Korean remains disputed, although it was historically /s/ and is therefore written as such. The surface realization is as follows:

  • After a vowel and before an obstruent: Tensing of the subsequent obstruent (prescriptively preferred), or [t̚]
  • After a sonorant consonant and before an obstruent: Tensing of the subsequent obstruent
  • Before a nasal consonant: [n] (prescriptively preferred), or full assimilation with the nasal

Interfix[edit]

(-s-)

  1. The saitsori or "genitive -s-", a marker used between the components of many (but not all) compound nouns, typically when the components have a genitive relationship or when the first component is attributive.
    칫솔 (chitsol, “toothbrush”) - from (, chi, “tooth”) + + (sol, “brush”), etymologically "brush of teeth"
    샛별 (saetbyeol, “morning star”) - from (sae, “east”) + + (byeol, “star”), etymologically "star of the east"
    나뭇잎 (namunnip, “tree leaf”) - from 나무 (namu, “tree”) + + (ip, “leaf”), etymologically "leaf of trees"
    바닷물 (badanmul, “seawater”) - from 바다 (bada, “sea”) + + (mul, “water”), etymologically "water of the sea"
    돌집 (doljjip, “stone house”) - from (dol, “stone”) + + (jip, “house”), etymologically "house of stone"
    안과 (眼科, ankkwa, “ophthalmology”) - from (, an, “eye”) + + (, gwa, “branch of study”), etymologically "study of eyes"
    물가 (物價, mulkka, “prices (of commodities in the economy)”) - from (, mul, “thing”) + + (, ga, “price”), etymologically "price of things"
    강점 (強點, gangjjeom, “advantage”) - from (, gang, “strength, strong”) + + (, jeom, “point”), etymologically "point of strength"

Usage notes[edit]

This morpheme can surface only in the following environments:

If it is followed by /i/ or /j/, the interfix /n/ intervenes between the morpheme and the second element: hence 뒷일 (dwinnil, “later things”) is realized as [twinnil] rather than [twisil]. While the morpheme may theoretically also be present between obstruent consonants, its tensing effects are indistinguishable from the regular tensing of an obstruent when preceded by another obstruent. Therefore, its existence cannot be ascertained in those compound nouns.

The existence of the interfix in specific words varies greatly depending on age and location. Two compounds involving the same morpheme and with similar semantics may still differ in their use of the interfix: there is tensing in 비빔밥 (bibimbap, “bibimbap, a rice dish with mixed ingredients”) but not in 비빔국수 (bibimguksu, “bibim-guksu, a noodle dish with mixed ingredients”), despite effectively identical semantics. In Sino-Korean, compare:

  • 불법 (佛法, bulbeop, “Buddha's law”) without tensing but 신법 (神法, sinppeop, “god's law”) with tensing
  • 소수 (小數, sosu, “decimal number”) without tensing but 소수 (素數, sossu, “prime number”) with tensing

With compound Sino-Korean words, the interfix appears (in the form of tensing) only before certain hanja, sometimes even in non-genitive or non-attributive constructions. A leading hypothesis is that the interfix has a tendency to appear in Sino-Korean compounds which are still transparent compounds in modern Korean. For instance, (, byeong, “disease”) is tensed in 화병 (火病, hwappyeong, “sickness from frustration”) because Koreans perceive the word as a compound of (, hwa, “anger, frustration”) and (, byeong, “disease”). It is not tensed in 나병 (癩病, nabyeong, “leprosy”) because (, na) in isolation is not a valid morpheme in Korean, and the word is therefore not perceived as a compound by Korean speakers. Nonetheless, a recent study (Yu 2019) notes that it appears impossible to posit any satisfactory semantic explanation that explains all cases of Sino-Korean tensing.

The extremely common word (geo, thing) is always preceded by the interfix in genitive constructions, and (sok, inside) is also very commonly preceded by it:

  • (ni kkeo, “your thing”) - from (ni, “you”) + + (geo, “thing”)
  • 일본 (ilbon kkeo, “something from Japan”) - from 일본 (日本, ilbon, “Japan”) + + (geo, “thing”)
  • 컴퓨터 (keompyuteo ssok, “inside the computer”) - from 컴퓨터 (keompyuteo, “computer”) + + (sok, “inside”)

Contrast with non-genitive forms, with no tensing:

However, these are usually analyzed as special allomorphs of these common words, rather than as the morpheme continuing to function as a true particle.

In North Korea, the morpheme is only pronounced and not written. In the South Korean prescriptive standard, it is only written under the following conditions:

  • The first component of the compound word ends in a vowel
  • At least one of the components is a native word, with six exceptions in which it occurs in entirely Sino-Korean words.

It is unwritten in other conditions. In practice, it is often omitted even when it should prescriptively be written.

The latter criterion did not exist in South Korea until 1988, and Sino-Korean words were also prescriptively written with the morpheme if the first element ended with a vowel:

This was deprecated in a 1988 spelling reform, except for six words which were excluded from the reform for unclear reasons, but certain officially deprecated spellings such as 갯수 (gaetsu) for 개수 (個數, gaesu, “number”) and 댓가 (daetga) for 대가 (代價, daega, “price”) remain widespread if nonstandard.

See also[edit]

For quantitative data on this morpheme in Sino-Korean compounds, including a list of tensing hanja and the percentage of words in which tensing occurs for each, see Appendix:Sino-Korean tensing.

References[edit]

  • Iksop Lee, S. Roberts Ramsey (2000) The Korean Language, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, →ISBN, pages 77—79
  • 노명희 (2014), “한자어 형성과 기능 단위”, in Hangugeo uimihak, volume 43, pages 159—185
  • 유경민 (2019), “어말 일음절 한자의 경음화와 사전 정보”, in Hangugeo uimihak, volume 64, DOI:10.19033/sks.2019.6.64.85, pages 85—106