Appendix talk:Russian doublets

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

@Erutuon: I suspect you might like this one even more. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

@Per utramque cavernam Note this kind of alterations: надежда (nadežda)надёжа (nadjóža), одежда (odežda)одёжа (odjóža). And many more. Regard Orthowiki: Церковнославянизмы, there are a lot more ways to see doublets, you should reflect it at least in the description. (I don’t edit anything now know lest I disturb your work.) Palaestrator verborum (loquier) 01:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

@Palaestrator verborum: Do you know if there's a template similar to {{l}} but without automatic transliteration? It's frankly annoying to have to write |tr=- everytime. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

No, but [[]] is fine enough for Russian mostly, innit. You could make a wrapper for l with tr=- but dude, these are just five additional signs. What I would need is a template that does transliterate but not link, as for شُنَارَى‏ (šunārā) in سِنَّوْر (sinnawr). Palaestrator verborum sis loquier 🗣 15:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
I'd prefer to use [[]], if only because we wouldn't have any memory overload, but the problem is that it doesn't redirect you to the right section, and that (relatedly) it's not enough for the orange links gadget to work.
Yes, I know five characters is not a lot, but having to add parameters to suppress a behaviour is always annoying; that's why I wanted to remove the automatic text from {{bor}}, for example.
I see that Erutuon is working on a doublets table at Appendix:English doublets/table, though; maybe that table could be devised so that there be no translit. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
@Per utramque cavernam: That table template already doesn't add transliteration. It might even work as-is on this page. — Eru·tuon 21:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
@Erutuon: It works :-) --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 22:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
@Erutuon Hello. It's not really important, but this causes a module error. Could you look into it? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Per utramque cavernam: Yes, that was the wrong module error. A different, more informative one was intended. ^.^ — Eru·tuon 13:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Erutuon: Ahah, thanks, but what I meant was: it would be nice to be able to write "хоро́мы (“mansion”, plurale tantum)". --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Per utramque cavernam: I knew that needed to be done, but knew it was going to be complicated. Done. — Eru·tuon 15:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Erutuon: Thanks! I don't realise what I'm putting you through :p --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Unresolved cases[edit]